9道题
China Daily, in partnership with relevant organizations, is launching the International Cartoon and Illustration Exhibition 2025 on a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind, hoping to promote the trustworthy use of technology for the benefit of humanity through creative cartoons and illustrations.
Exhibition focusThe theme of this year’s exhibition is “Technology and Life”. Potential topics include:
1. Displaying how technology changes people’s livesThe awards are categorized into 4 types: Gold Prize (1 winner) with ¥30,000 prize money; Silver Prize (2 winners) with ¥20,000; Bronze Prize (3 winners) with ¥10,000; 10 Outstanding Prize winners with an award. Additionally, all the winners will receive a certificate and portfolio (作品集) book.
Requirements for submission| A.To show admiration for technology experts. |
| B.To encourage reliable application of technology. |
| C.To show the latest cartoon and illustration techniques. |
| D.To promote the development of artificial intelligence. |
| A.An 11M submission marked AI-generated. |
| B.A reproduced cartoon drawing in JPEG format. |
| C.An illustration of 6M with a video explanation. |
| D.A titled entry without the instructor’s signature. |
| A.Cartoonists and illustrators. | B.College students. |
| C.exhibitors and organizers. | D.AI enthusiasts. |
The road stretched endlessly ahead. I paused to take a few careful sips of water — only enough to moisten my tongue, since the bottle was already half-empty — and weigh my options. The shade from the trees did little to ease the burning sun as I struggled to make sense of the maps. The original plan was to stay overnight at a tourist park near Logue Brook Dam, where I could finally reach my wife, but right then, I didn’t have the faintest idea where I was. Wearily, I pushed myself upright, remounted my bike and started to double back in the hope of spotting clear trail markers, but this only made things worse: the trees seemed to press in around me as I desperately scanned for landmarks — and the cicadas (蝉) had erupted into a deafening chorus.
After cycling slowly along the sandy trail for about two hours, I was delighted to see seemingly recent cycle tracks. Encouraged, I moved on, keeping a sharp eye on the tracks. However, I soon realised that they were my own. I was covering the same ground.
Discouraged, I lay my bike aside, and sank down under a tree with a heavy sigh. I had no more water, and my tongue felt swollen. I felt sleepy as groups of flies settled on me in a vain attempt to find dampness.
A sudden warm breeze stirred me. I opened my eyes, caught the distant hum of an engine, and glanced weakly upward, yet the sound faded away. After a short while, I heard it once more, but this time it seemed nearer. I dragged my feet and marched toward the source of the sound. When I made it to the top of the hill, I gasped in utter disbelief. There in front of me lay Logue Brook Dam, with boats pulling water skiers and folks sunbathing out in the open. I went back to my bicycle, pushed it up the hill, and let it coast into the lovely cool waters of the dam, where I rolled around wearing my full cycling gear.
【小题1】What can be inferred about the 1st paragraph?| A.The author desperately contacted his wife at the tourist park. |
| B.The author found the trail markers easily after doubling back. |
| C.The author felt confused and helpless in the current environment. |
| D.The cicadas’ noise was so loud that the author couldn’t find landmarks. |
| A.When trail markers disappeared. |
| B.When he recognized his own bike tracks. |
| C.When the loud cicada noises disturbed him. |
| D.When he noticed the change in sandy trail conditions. |
| A.To show he was awed at the abundant wildlife. |
| B.To describe the surroundings were becoming tougher. |
| C.To illustrate his physical discomfort was intensifying. |
| D.To inform he unconsciously entered a dangerous zone. |
| A.He deserted his bike near the coast. | B.He failed to locate the dam and gave up. |
| C.He pushed his bike and rolled about the dam. | D.He had the bike freewheel downhill and had fun. |
Soaring above a desert expanse in an aircraft, two scientists looked down with trained eyes at trees and bushes. After an hour’s flight, one of the scientists jotted in his book, “Look here for probable metal”. Meanwhile, aboard another plane cruising over a mountainous terrain, scientists sent a message to other counterparts on the ground, “Gold possible.” Walking across hilly ground, four scientists documented their findings,” This ground should be searched for metals. “From an airplane hovering over a hilly wasteland, a scientist sent back by radio one word,” Uranium.”
None of the scientists possessed X-ray eyes: they had no supernatural powers for looking down below the earth’s surface. They were merely employing one of the most cutting- edge methodologies for locating minerals in the ground-using trees and plants as indicative markers that certain minerals may lie beneath the ground on which the trees and plants take root and flourish. This approach to mineral exploration is predicated upon the principle that minerals deep in the earth may affect the kind of bushes and trees that grow on the surface.
At Watson Bar Creek, a brook six thousand feet high in the mountains of British Columbia, Canada, a mineral search group gathered bags of tree seeds. Boxes were filled with small branches from the trees. Roots were dug and put into boxes. Each bag and box was carefully marked. In a scientific laboratory the parts of the forest trees were burned to ashes and tested. Each small part was examined to learn whether there were minerals in it.
Analysis of the roots, branches, and seeds disclosed an absence of silver. But small amounts of gold were detected in the roots, with lower gold concentrations present in the branches and seeds. The seeds growing nearest to the tree trunk had more gold than those growing on the ends of the branches.
Had the trees not provided indications of gold in the ground, the scientists would not have allocated funds for digging into the depths. They did excavate and uncovered additional gold reserves below the surface. Further digging revealed substantial quantities of the precious metal.
【小题1】Why could scientists tell possible mineral existence from plants?| A.Scientists are trained to see through the earth’s surface and detect minerals. |
| B.Some minerals deep in the earth can influence the type of surface vegetation. |
| C.The roots can absorb and transport minerals to branches and seeds in large quantities. |
| D.Plants growing in mineral- rich areas have unique shapes easy to identify from the air. |
| A.branches tend to hold more gold than roots |
| B.roots contain less gold than seeds near the trunk |
| C.gold content in branches far from the trunk is higher than in seeds |
| D.seeds closer to the trunk likely have more gold than those at branch ends |
| A.By presenting a case study. | B.By listing different types of minerals. |
| C.By making a comparison. | D.By explaining the chemical mechanism. |
| A.Scientists Study Tree Components for Gold. |
| B.Trees and Plants: Clues to Underground Minerals. |
| C.New Ways of searching for Underground Minerals. |
| D.The Process of Gold Exploration in Trees and Plants. |
Regardless of how famous they are, and despite the star treatment they receive, many celebrities make it a point to give back to charities. Some have even set up their own private foundations. Their widely publicised visits to troubled areas of the world help to raise awareness of issues such as famine and poverty. According to Jane Cooper of Unicef UK, celebrities have a unique ability to reach huge numbers of people, many of whom might not otherwise be engaged in charitable causes. She pointed out that famous faces had played a significant role in raising funds in recent years, and their energies had produced tangible results, such as enabling millions of children in poorer countries to attend school.
But in spite of these successes, there is evidence to suggest that celebrity endorsement (代言) may be overrated. In a survey of members of the public to find out if celebrity involvement would encourage people to donate, researchers found that the impact was not as great as previously thought. When shown a list of well-known organisations and famous people who represent them, over half of respondents were unable to match the celebrity with the cause. What’s more, three quarters claimed that they didn’t respond to celebrity endorsement in any way. The survey also showed that a few names did stand out as being associated with particular charities. But the presence of a celebrity in a campaign, was not a significant factor when it came to a decision to donate time or money. Instead, the majority of people contribute because of personal connections in their lives and families which make a charity important to them.
In another study aimed at young people, most participants cited a compelling (无法抗拒的) mission as their main motivation to give. The second most important drive was if a friend or peer recommended supporting a particular cause. Only two percent of respondents said they were motivated by celebrity endorsement. This seems to contradict the general assumption that teenagers are particularly influenced by famous people. One possible explanation is that there is a general fatigue (疲倦) with celebrity culture. There is also a suspicion that the stars are the ones who benefit most when they offer to do charity work. Some critiques have accused that celebrities might actually take attention away from issues by attracting more attention than the causes they represent.
So taking all these issues into account, is it time for charities to rethink their campaign strategies and look for alternative ways to reach new audiences? Whichever point of view you favour, there seems to be opportunities for more research into how charity campaigns might develop relationships with celebrities to maximise their potential. This in turn will open up more engagement, and better targeted campaigns — which can only benefit those who really matter — the people and animals that are in need of assistance.
【小题1】What does the underlined word “tangible” in Paragraph 1 probably mean?| A.Controversial. | B.Celebrated. | C.Definite. | D.Temporarily. |
| A.Celebrity involvement is key to motivating people to donate. |
| B.All people are not influenced by celebrities in charity donations. |
| C.Most people contribute to charities because they are inspired by the family. |
| D.None of the people believe celebrities make any difference to their donation. |
| A.how young people react to celebrity culture |
| B.who is to blame for taking attention away from charities |
| C.what mainly motivates young people to be engaged in charitable giving |
| D.why young people are rarely influenced by celebrities in charity donations |
| A.Objective. | B.Positive. | C.Negative. | D.Unclear. |
When your Home Becomes a Tourist Attraction
Have you ever looked at a beautiful little new house in London and thought “It must be so amazing to live there”?
Alice Johnston is a longtime resident of Notting Hill, the London neighborhood famous for the beautifully-painted row houses and for being the setting of the movie of the same name. Johnston, a journalist, has complicated feelings about her Instagram- beloved neighborhood. She lives on Portobello Road, one of the capital’s most famous streets.
| A.If so, you’re not alone. |
| B.But there can be a darker side. |
| C.For her, nothing beats the pleasure to see so many people excited about it. |
| D.Living in a much-photographed place, some people try to take the good with the bad. |
| E.However, when private homes become tourist attractions, quarrels can occur. |
| F.And she has witnessed all kinds of behavior committed to getting a perfect picture. |
| G.As a travel lover, she has become pretty understanding when seeing the crowds again. |
Mr. Dalton taught us plane geometry (平面几何) 37 years ago. I was a quiet kid, neither getting in much trouble nor getting
Toward the end of the year, Mr. Dalton wanted to
I completed 24 problems quickly, but number seventeen was a lion
The next day I got my score, a 96, and number seventeen was
Instead of
When I returned 37 years later to visit him again, Alzheimer’s (阿尔茨海默氏症) had
I have been grateful to Mr. Dalton, for I could
| A.punished | B.noticed | C.confused | D.caught |
| A.clicked | B.existed | C.accounted | D.twisted |
| A.expand | B.further | C.evaluate | D.witness |
| A.result | B.reasoning | C.category | D.principle |
| A.out of control | B.ahead of time | C.above average | D.in the way |
| A.gradually | B.eventually | C.mostly | D.constantly |
| A.depression | B.satisfaction | C.embarrassment | D.fascination |
| A.proved | B.entitled | C.detected | D.marked |
| A.shot up | B.took up | C.came up | D.got up |
| A.suspecting | B.admitting | C.implying | D.arguing |
| A.reasons | B.methods | C.conclusions | D.mistakes |
| A.sceptical | B.cheerful | C.admiring | D.indifferent |
| A.fame | B.scholarship | C.credit | D.faith |
| A.claimed | B.undergone | C.lowered | D.crossed |
| A.merely | B.therefore | C.otherwise | D.still |